Noticias
- 24/12/2024
- 24/12/2024
- 24/12/2024
- 20/12/2024
Does the Stockholm Programme matter.
Autor:
Sergio Carrera, Elspeth Guild
Ciudad:
Bruselas
Editorial:
CEPS Papers
Fecha:
14/12/2012
Comentario
Sergio Carrera and Elspeth Guild, Does the Stockholm Programme matter? The Struggles over Ownership of AFSJ Multiannual Programming, Justice and Home Affairs, CEPS Papers in Liberty and Security in Europe.
- Does the 2009 Stockholm Programme matter? This paper addresses the controversies experienced at EU institutional levels as to ‘who’ should have ownership of the contours of the EU’s policy and legislative multiannual programming in the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice (AFSJ) in a post-Lisbon Treaty landscape. It examines the struggles around the third multiannual programme on the AFSJ, i.e. the Stockholm Programme, and the dilemmas affecting its implementation. The latest affair to emerge relates to the lack of fulfilment by the European Commission of the commitment to provide a mid-term evaluation of the Stockholm Programme’s implementation by mid-2012, as requested by both the Council and the European Parliament.
- This paper shifts the focus to a broader perspective and raises the following questions: Is the Stockholm Programme actually relevant? What do the discussions behind its implementation tell us about the new institutional dynamics affecting European integration on the AFSJ? Does the EU actually need a new (post-Stockholm) multiannual programme for the period 2015–20? And last, what role should the EP play in legislative and policy programming in order to further strengthen the democratic accountability and legitimacy of the EU’s AFSJ?
Otros informes de ambos autores: